Showing posts with label Deals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deals. Show all posts

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Urgent: In sale, NYT Co. reduces Red Sox stake

The just-announced deal with Henry McCance, chairman emeritus of Silicon Valley venture capital firm Greylock Partners, doesn't disclose terms. In a statement, NYT Co. said it would record an undisclosed pre-tax gain in the second quarter. The deal still leaves the Times with a nearly 17% position in the pro team, plus affiliated businesses in New England Sports Ventures.

Related: The New York Times' story on its Media Decoder blog

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Reuters: Mexico's Slim empire 'loses luster'

In a new story today, Reuters reports that technology, regulation and growing competitors are chipping away at Telmex, the cornerstone of big New York Times Co. investor Carlos Slim's telecommunications holdings, and "once-frantic sales growth" at his America Movil wireless operator is tapering off.

"He has a collection of crowns and a collection of jewels," telecommunications consultant Ernesto Piedras told Reuters. "But any company has its business cycle. His most dynamic phase has passed."

Slim (above) plowed $250 million into the NYT Co. after the company agreed to pay an interest rate of more than 14%, The Wall Street Journal reported in July.

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

Friday, January 8, 2010

In host of challenges, NYT's future hinges on one

That is management's decision about whether to charge consumers to read content on its Website, says MarketWatch media columnist Jon Friedman. "Times people stress that Arthur Sulzberger Jr. (left), chairman and publisher, and Janet Robinson, the parent company's president and chief executive, have thoroughly researched the pros and cons of charging for content,'' Friedman writes today. "But as the media world has waited for the Times to do something, its top management has maddeningly shuffled its feet on this crucial issue."

Against that backdrop, Friedman predicts the New York Times Co. will get a takeover offer this year -- mostly like from growing business media giant Bloomberg LP.

Earlier: NYT Co. shares close at new 52-week high

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Lawsuit says top investor Harbinger bid unfairly

The Wall Street Journal is now reporting: "An aggrieved suitor in a 2006 bid to buy an appliance firm alleges that Harbinger Capital Partners, a prominent hedge fund that won the takeover battle, received nonpublic information about the rival bid and accumulated a big stake before the deal talks were made public, according to a preliminary ruling in the Delaware Chancery Court."

Harbinger owns 18.4 million shares of the NYTCo., according to its most recent federal regulatory filing, on Dec. 3 -- a stake that it's recently been reducing. That was equal to about 13% of all shares, based on the last 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

In an earlier trimming of its holdings, Nov. 19, the NYT DealBook blog said Harbinger owned nearly 15% of all shares at the time. That was based on the 21 million it owned at that point, the November filing shows.

Today's WSJ story continues: "In a lawsuit alleging breach of contract and other claims related to its failed bid, Nacco Industries Inc. alleges that executives of takeover target Applica Inc. passed tips through a consultant working for Harbinger, a New York hedge fund run by Philip Falcone. Nacco sells Hamilton Beach-brand appliances."

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Deals | GQ on 'vulgarian' Murdoch's takeover

In a new story with implications for The New York Times, GQ magazine -- better known as a men's fashion glossy -- aims its gun barrel at the two-year-old sale of The Wall Street Journal to News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch. "It was a stunning turn of events whose significance is still coming into focus,'' the magazine says, as it recounts a litany of predictions about where the Australian "vulgarian" Murdoch would take the storied newspaper.

One one grim prediction coming true: Murdoch is taking steps to turn the Journal into the preeminent national daily, an attack on the market now claimed by the NYTCo.'s flagship, the Times.

The story continues: "The Murdoch takeover marks the beginning of the end of the newspaper world as we once knew it. In the two years since the Bancrofts sold out, nearly 200 newspapers in the United States have gone under. The Rocky Mountain News, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and Ann Arbor News are dead. The San Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Philadelphia Inquirer, and entire Tribune chain are barely hanging on. Nearly 47,000 jobs have been lost. But under Murdoch, the Wall Street Journal is not only still publishing, but also, unbelievably, hiring."

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

[Image: GQ]

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Documents track annual NYT Co. employment cuts

As The New York Times draws closer to cutting 100 newsroom jobs, a review of the parent company's total employment reveals a declining workforce in recent years. The chart (left) shows total employment for the New York Times Co. at the end of each year, based on annual reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The especially big decline between 2006-2007 reflect the sale of the company's nine-station broadcast television division.

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Citing progress, NYT says it won't sell Worcester

Ending months of speculation, NYT has decided it won't sell the Worcester Telegram & Gazette, according to a new Boston Globe report. "In a note to Telegram employees," the Globe reports, "Times Co. chairman Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. and chief executive Janet L. Robinson said the Central Massachusetts paper is 'making substantial progress in transforming every part of its journalistic and business operations' after job cuts, cost reductions and other.

The move follows a similar decision by the Times Co. in mid-October to keep the Globe in its portfolio as well.